Thursday, December 19, 2013
What do you do?
play magic, pretend to knit, play board games, pretend to play PC games, eat chocolate pretend to do dishes...
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
uprising and organizing
1. uprising with a leader
There are two major issues with using a single person as a leader and figurehead of your group. The first, that they will be subverted from your cause. The second is that they are susceptible to assassination, threat, coercion, blackmail, and other tactics admittedly used by the government to eliminate movements
2. uprising without a leader but with a panel or group
With this threats to one or more persons may not destroy the group. The death of one or more people may not destroy the group. However, with this method, agent provocateur taking power or massive criminalization becomes the tools of choice against the organizers. Disagreements over tactics, arguments, inefficiencies, and mass arrests may be expected. Betrayals by individuals who have been members from the beginning can expected, people are ostracized by accusations of subversion, even if no members of the group are agents, they can be framed destabilizing the group and creating distrust.
3. uprising using pure democracy
Time is wasted, decisions are not made, agents easily derail the system by taking over meetings, making accusations, disagreeing with decisions, and creating chaos. Without a figure-head or a unified list of demands the corporate controlled media is easily able to misrepresent the movement and purpose leaving the impression of disorganization and confusion. Mass arrests become more impracticable, power is not able to be taken by agents as easily, assassinations are inefficient.
We are at a disadvantage. How can these tactics be fought against. How can suspicion be combated.
There are two major issues with using a single person as a leader and figurehead of your group. The first, that they will be subverted from your cause. The second is that they are susceptible to assassination, threat, coercion, blackmail, and other tactics admittedly used by the government to eliminate movements
2. uprising without a leader but with a panel or group
With this threats to one or more persons may not destroy the group. The death of one or more people may not destroy the group. However, with this method, agent provocateur taking power or massive criminalization becomes the tools of choice against the organizers. Disagreements over tactics, arguments, inefficiencies, and mass arrests may be expected. Betrayals by individuals who have been members from the beginning can expected, people are ostracized by accusations of subversion, even if no members of the group are agents, they can be framed destabilizing the group and creating distrust.
3. uprising using pure democracy
Time is wasted, decisions are not made, agents easily derail the system by taking over meetings, making accusations, disagreeing with decisions, and creating chaos. Without a figure-head or a unified list of demands the corporate controlled media is easily able to misrepresent the movement and purpose leaving the impression of disorganization and confusion. Mass arrests become more impracticable, power is not able to be taken by agents as easily, assassinations are inefficient.
We are at a disadvantage. How can these tactics be fought against. How can suspicion be combated.
Friday, July 26, 2013
Why the government should be watching us:
1. It's illegal. (illegal search and seizure)
2. Congress can't pass laws to make it legal. (laws passed by congress that are unconstitutional are invalid)
3. it's wrong. (it's morally wrong)
4. It doesn't work (it's ineffective)
5. it's expensive. (billions of dollars are wasted that could be spent on education/food/water/bees/tax rebates)
Terrorism is a lie. It's statistically insignificant. Every dollar we spend saves .00000000000~ lives. Terrorist are winning. We are bankrupting our country, destroying our freedom, and living in fear of a few hundred people. We should be embarrassed. Hell, I am embarrassed. Who knew that killing a few hundred Americans could change the direction of the country. Sending ripples throughout generations. What happened to our resilience and drive to be better. Make no mistake, it will only get worse and it can get so much worse.
1. It's illegal. (illegal search and seizure)
2. Congress can't pass laws to make it legal. (laws passed by congress that are unconstitutional are invalid)
3. it's wrong. (it's morally wrong)
4. It doesn't work (it's ineffective)
5. it's expensive. (billions of dollars are wasted that could be spent on education/food/water/bees/tax rebates)
Terrorism is a lie. It's statistically insignificant. Every dollar we spend saves .00000000000~ lives. Terrorist are winning. We are bankrupting our country, destroying our freedom, and living in fear of a few hundred people. We should be embarrassed. Hell, I am embarrassed. Who knew that killing a few hundred Americans could change the direction of the country. Sending ripples throughout generations. What happened to our resilience and drive to be better. Make no mistake, it will only get worse and it can get so much worse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
